Random Forest vs Logistic Regression in Predictive Analytics Applications

dc.contributor.authorPalacat, Christi
dc.contributor.instructorWen, Eric
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-25T00:29:44Z
dc.date.available2019-05-25T00:29:44Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.description.abstractAre there significant differences in prediction accuracy between modern data-mining approaches and classical regression methods? Which approach is easier to explain to enrollment managers when estimating student outcomes of varying levels of complexity? Complexity in the data is typically associated with quality, quantity, and the interaction of predictor variables. To test for such differences, this study compares the classification accuracy of a random forest algorithm with binomial logistic regression for purposes of predicting student admission yield. Findings are translated into operationally meaningful indicators in the context of enhanced institutional research on yield prediction and enrollment forecast analysis. Although the selection of predictor variables is guided by the research on estimating admission yield at a large public university, the presentation focuses on which method promises greater prediction accuracy and how easily each approach can be explained to enrollment managers who also desire interpretable results.
dc.format.extent1 page
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10790/4636
dc.language.isoen-US
dc.publisherUniversity of Hawaii - West Oahu
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.titleRandom Forest vs Logistic Regression in Predictive Analytics Applications
dc.typePresentation
dc.type.dcmiText

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ssym-fall2018-0002_ada.pdf
Size:
5.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.73 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: